Explainers & Guides

Navigating Supply Chain Risks in the UK Legal Sector: Taking a TPRM Approach

In this article you will learn about the specific supply chain cyber security challenges and risks facing the UK legal sector, and how an effective third-party risk management programme could help.

Navigating Supply Chain Risks in the UK Legal Sector: Taking a TPRM ApproachNavigating Supply Chain Risks in the UK Legal Sector: Taking a TPRM Approach

UK law firms rely on a complex network of third-party service providers and partners to deliver high-quality legal services. 

From document management systems and legal research platforms to IT services and outsourced legal support, these external relationships are integral to daily operations. However, they also introduce significant risks that can compromise a law firm's security, regulatory compliance, and impact its reputation.

Recent data reveals a staggering 77% increase in cyber attacks on UK law firms in just one year, underscoring the sector's vulnerability to supply chain disruptions. A prime example is the recent cyber attack on CTS, an IT services provider serving hundreds of law firms, which caused widespread operational disruptions and compromised sensitive data.

With 62% of data breaches today linked to third parties, the consequences for law firms can be severe, including system downtime, regulatory penalties, and loss of client trust. As a result, implementing a robust Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) programme should be a top priority for forward-thinking legal practices.

In this article, we will explore TPRM in the context of the legal sector, examining the specific supply chain risks facing UK law firms and providing actionable strategies to effectively mitigate these risks and secure their corporate supply chains against cyber-attacks and data breaches.

Supply Chain Risks for Legal Firms are Increasing

The legal sector's supply chain has evolved into a convoluted ecosystem of external partners and services necessary for the delivery of premium legal services. 

Encompassing document production services, expert witnesses, IT providers, legal research platforms, and various outsourced operational and digital services, the intricacy of this service web is growing exponentially, magnifying potential vulnerabilities.

Recent incidents underscore the severity and frequency of supply chain threats to law firms:

  1. CTS Attack (2023): This recent and highly relevant case affected 80-200 UK law firms. The cyber attack on IT services provider CTS resulted in system outages lasting over a week. Firms could not access critical documents and data, causing major disruptions to operations and property transactions.
  2. Allen & Overy Ransomware Attack (2023): While not strictly a supply chain attack, this incident compromised systems and data at one of the prestigious "Magic Circle" law firms. It highlighted that even the most sophisticated legal entities are vulnerable to cyber threats.
  3. iManage Cloud Outage (2020): This incident demonstrated the risks associated with cloud service dependencies. Numerous law firms lost access to their documents for several days when iManage, a popular document management system, experienced a major outage.
  4. DLA Piper NotPetya Attack (2017): Part of a broader supply chain attack, DLA Piper fell victim to the NotPetya malware that spread through compromised accounting software. The firm reportedly incurred millions in losses due to downtime and recovery efforts, illustrating the global repercussions of software supplier attacks for law firms.

These examples highlight the increasing vulnerability of law firms to supply chain cyber attacks, whether through IT service providers, software vendors, or cloud platforms.

Key Supply Chain Risks in the Legal Sector

Several particular third-party relationships and dependencies in the legal supply chain create significant security risks for law firms. These are as follows:

Document Production Services

Document production services primarily risk data security and quality control breaches. Data breaches could expose sensitive information like merger plans or intellectual property details. Quality control issues alter the meaning of legal documents, leading to far-reaching legal implications.

Expert Witnesses

Expert witnesses introduce credibility concerns and qualification risks. Undisclosed conflicts of interest or questionable credentials undermine cases and potentially lead to negligence accusations against law firms.

IT Service Providers

IT service providers pose cyber security threats and system downtime risks. Vulnerabilities in third-party software or cloud services create entry points for attackers, while IT outages disrupt case management, document access, and client communication.

Legal Research Platforms

Legal research platforms risk providing inaccurate information and experiencing service interruptions. Outdated or incorrect legal information leads to flawed advice, while service interruptions impact case preparation.

Outsourced Legal Services

Outsourced services risk confidentiality breaches and inconsistent work quality. Law firms must ensure all outsourced partners adhere to stringent data protection standards and maintain consistent quality in their work.

Why These Services Increase Law Firms Vulnerability

Each new partner or service integrated into a firm's operations introduces additional points of risk and new vulnerabilities that must be meticulously managed to ensure the integrity and continuity of legal services.

This heightened risk stems from several key factors:

  1. Expanded Attack Surface: Each new third-party service introduces additional entry points for potential attackers. This expanded attack surface means more potential vulnerabilities for cybercriminals to exploit, increasing the overall risk of a successful breach.
  2. Varied Security Standards: Different service providers have varying levels of security measures in place. Law firms must rely on each vendor's security practices, which will not always meet the high standards required for handling sensitive legal information.
  3. Data Sharing and Access: Legal work often requires sharing sensitive client information with third-party services. Each instance of data sharing introduces risks of unauthorised access, data leakage, or breach of client confidentiality.
  4. Limited Visibility and Control: As the number of third-party services grows, law firms will likely struggle to maintain comprehensive visibility into their entire supply chain. This lack of oversight can lead to undetected vulnerabilities or delayed responses to security incidents.
  5. Difficulty in Due Diligence: Thoroughly vetting an increasing number of service providers becomes increasingly challenging and resource-intensive. This can lead to overlooked risks or inadequate scrutiny of potential partners.
  6. Inconsistent Incident Response: Different third-party providers have varying incident response capabilities and protocols. This inconsistency can lead to delayed or inadequate responses to security incidents, potentially exacerbating the impact on the law firm.
  7. Technological Interdependencies: As law firms rely more on interconnected technologies, a vulnerability in one system can potentially compromise others. For example, a flaw in a document management system could potentially be exploited to gain access to other connected systems.

Importance of Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) for UK Law Firms

These factors all contribute to a landscape in which UK law firms must be even more diligent managing risks emanating from their third parties. In addition to protecting client and corporate data, there are numerous other reasons for this. 

Regulatory Pressures & Compliance with New Legislation

Recent legislative developments, such as the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act (ECCTA), underscore the growing importance of supply chain oversight.

Furthermore, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) Standards and Regulations require law firms to maintain client confidentiality and have effective risk management systems. The Data Protection Act 2018 and UK GDPR mandate strict data protection measures, including for third-party relationships.

Client Expectations

Corporate clients expect law firms to protect their sensitive information and ensure that any third-party services meet the highest standards of security and confidentiality, whether they know the risks involved in the use of these services or not, but they expect so implicitly.

Financial and Reputational Costs

The consequences of a supply chain breach or service disruption can be severe, potentially leading to loss of client confidence, regulatory penalties, and lasting reputational damage.

Effective TPRM Practices for Risk Mitigation

Comprehensive Vendor Due Diligence Processes

Effective TPRM begins with a thorough vendor assessment, covering key risk areas such as data security, regulatory compliance, business continuity, IT & network security, their own third-party risk management as well as financial, ESG and sanctions risks. Moving beyond point-in-time assessments to continuous monitoring is essential in today's rapidly evolving risk landscape.

Supplier Categorisation

Classifying suppliers based on their criticality to business operations allows firms to focus their most intensive risk management efforts on the most crucial relationships. Identifying vendors that handle sensitive data is equally important, subjecting them to the strictest security and compliance requirements.

Contractual Agreements with Clear SLAs and Liability Clauses

Well-crafted contracts should include detailed service-level agreements, comprehensive data protection clauses, clear liability provisions, right-to-audit clauses, and termination provisions.

Implementing Secure Data-Sharing Protocols

Depending on the type of supplier, utilising strong encryption for all data transfers and implementing strict access controls and authentication measures for third-party systems are crucial practices.

Developing Contingency Plans for Service Disruptions

Creating backup vendor lists for critical services and establishing internal capabilities to reduce reliance on key vendors helps provide additional layers of resilience.

Conclusion

As discussed in this article, the importance of Third-Party Risk Management for UK law firms cannot be overstated. The legal sector's supply chain is becoming increasingly complex and vulnerable to various risks, from data breaches and service disruptions to regulatory non-compliance and reputational damage.

Effective TPRM provides a structured approach to managing these risks in the face of a growing third-party vendor ecosystem. By implementing the TPRM practices here discussed, law firms can protect their client's sensitive information and corporate data, maintain operational continuity, and safeguard their reputation in an increasingly competitive market.

Explainers & Guides

Download for free

By submitting this form, you agree to Risk Ledger’s Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Risk Ledger contacting you.

Thank you!
Download
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Explainers & Guides

Download for free

Download
Pattern Trapezoid Mesh

Join our growing community

Sign up to our monthly newsletter to receive exclusive research and analyses by our experts, the latest case studies from our clients as well as guides, explainers and more to turn your supply chain risk management programme into a resounding success story.