Explainers & Guides
Navigating Digital Supply Chain Risks Facing the Lloyd’s Insurance Market
A security risk assessment is a structured process that allows organisations to identify security vulnerabilities, evaluate their potential impact, and then implement appropriate controls to protect themselves. Importantly, a security risk assessment secures third-party vendor relationships by making risks visible and manageable before a security breach occurs.
Security leaders, however, face mounting pressure to execute this effectively. Attackers target overlooked weaknesses, regulators demand demonstrable resilience, and boards expect clear answers on risk posture, making security risk assessments a pivotal part of business operations.
Here, we address these challenges. We outline the requirements for running an assessment, the key steps, the types of controls tested, the tools that support the process, and the costs involved. After reading this guide, you’ll understand a practical framework for strengthening your organisation's compliance, governance, and resilience.
A security risk assessment pinpoints threats that can disrupt operations and identifies the controls needed to contain them. It spans both digital and physical domains, protecting data, networks, applications, and facilities.
Cyber threats range from ransomware to insider misuse, while physical risks include unauthorised access or environmental hazards. Assessments cut across governance, risk, and compliance, and are vital in extended supply chains, where vulnerabilities often sit with third or fourth parties.
Effective assessments rely on strong foundations: documented policies, clear governance roles, and leadership commitment. Aligning with frameworks such as ISO/IEC 27001, NIST CSF, or CIS Controls ensures risks are measured and reduced consistently.
The process begins with a full asset inventory of hardware, software, data flows, and vendor connections. Threat intelligence from industry ISACs, government alerts, or commercial feeds adds sector-specific context.
Success depends on cross-functional input: IT highlights technical gaps, procurement confirms supplier dependencies, compliance ensures regulatory fit, and operations tie everything to business priorities.
Risk assessments turn governance, risk, and compliance into evidence-driven practice.
They create audit-ready records, streamline regulatory reporting, and give boards clear metrics. Automation strengthens this further with real-time dashboards. Risk Ledger extends these benefits across the supply chain, mapping shared dependencies and exposing third- and fourth-party risk.
Assessments create value on two fronts: regulatory compliance and business resilience. Frameworks such as GDPR, ISO 27001, and NIS2 expect organisations to demonstrate structured, repeatable evaluations of their security posture. Beyond meeting obligations, assessments shield sensitive data and intellectual property, both prime targets in today’s threat landscape.
The financial rationale is equally compelling. IBM’s 2023 Cost of a Data Breach Report puts the global average breach cost at USD 4.45 million. Regular assessments close gaps before attackers can exploit them, reducing both direct financial losses and long-term recovery costs. Just as importantly, they signal strength to the market. Customers, partners, and regulators interpret consistent assessments as proof of a security-first culture.
Security risk assessments focus on three categories of controls.
Policies and governance mechanisms that set strategic direction. Examples include security frameworks, vendor oversight, and incident response playbooks.
Day-to-day safeguards that keep systems secure. These range from multi-factor authentication and privileged access management to continuous monitoring, log analysis, and staff training.
Measures that protect facilities and equipment. Badge systems, CCTV, perimeter barriers, and environmental defences such as fire suppression or climate control all fall within scope.
A checklist brings structure to what can otherwise become a fragmented exercise. It ensures that every critical step is captured, from defining scope to tracking remediation. Used consistently, it also creates a repeatable record for audits, board reporting, and regulatory reviews.
A disciplined checklist transforms an assessment from a one-off task into a foundation for continuous improvement.
Risk Ledger strengthens this process by mapping supplier dependencies and revealing how risks propagate across multiple tiers, providing the clarity needed for long-term resilience.
An effective risk assessment follows a structured path. Each stage builds on the last, creating a complete view of exposure and a roadmap for remediation. Done well, the process not only uncovers weaknesses but also aligns security priorities with business objectives.
Catalogue every asset, system, and vendor relationship that could be targeted. Use discovery tools to surface hidden infrastructure, apply penetration testing to probe defences, and conduct threat modelling to anticipate attacker tactics.
Examine technical safeguards, governance measures, and vendor policies already in place. Validate how well they perform under current conditions and document both strengths and shortcomings.
Judge each risk by its likelihood and potential business impact. Use a risk matrix or scoring model to distinguish between routine issues and exposures that could seriously disrupt operations.
Turn findings into an actionable remediation plan. Prioritise high-impact risks, assign accountable owners, set deadlines, and track progress through to resolution.
Embed resilience with continuous monitoring, regular employee training, and rehearsed incident response drills. Schedule reviews to adapt controls as new threats and technologies emerge.
Costs scale with scope. Internal reviews for smaller organisations average £10,000–£20,000, while enterprise assessments led by external consultants can exceed £100,000.
Key drivers include organisational size, number of assets and vendors, assessment frequency, and chosen tools. Despite the investment, assessments deliver strong returns by reducing breach costs, preventing outages, and avoiding fines. Platforms like Risk Ledger lower overall cost by embedding continuous vendor monitoring into daily operations.
Technology alone does not secure an organisation. Employees remain the first line of defence. Phishing simulations, data handling workshops, and e-learning modules strengthen awareness across global teams. Embedding training into the risk process reduces human error and ensures security culture grows alongside technical measures.
The right tools turn a security risk assessment from a static report into a continuous, intelligence-driven process. They allow teams to map risks in real time, validate controls, and demonstrate measurable improvements to executives and regulators.
Spreadsheets and manual risk registers remain common entry points but quickly become unwieldy in large or complex environments. Modern platforms deliver real-time scoring, automated supplier mapping, and continuous updates from vendor assessments.
Threat intelligence insight enriches this data by highlighting active attack campaigns and industry-specific risks, ensuring assessments stay aligned with reality.
Mobile access enables leaders to monitor dashboards and respond to changes immediately, maintaining active oversight beyond the office.
Effective tools directly link risks to remediation tasks, assigning owners, setting deadlines, and providing evidence of progress. This enforces accountability and ensures findings translate into measurable outcomes.
Boards and regulators expect proof of progress. Tools that visualise KPIs, highlight long-term trends, and benchmark performance against industry peers provide the clarity needed to secure buy-in and sustain investment.
In practice, effective tooling combines visibility, action, and measurement. Platforms like Risk Ledger extend these capabilities across supply chains, helping organisations transform assessments from one-off checklists into ongoing, collaborative risk management.
Security risk assessments give organisations the clarity to uncover vulnerabilities, measure their impact, and act decisively.
Risk Ledger enables businesses to extend this discipline into their supply chains, closing blind spots and building collaborative defences. In a threat landscape where every dependency matters, structured assessments backed by shared intelligence are the foundation of long-term security and trust.
Identify risks, review controls, assess severity, mitigate vulnerabilities, and monitor continuously. This sequence creates a clear and repeatable process.
A security risk assessment is a structured evaluation of threats to systems, data, and facilities. It highlights which assets are exposed and prescribes the controls required to protect them.
The six elements are asset identification, threat analysis, vulnerability assessment, control evaluation, risk determination, and risk treatment. Together, they define the full picture of organisational risk and provide a framework for action.
Sign up to our monthly newsletter to receive exclusive research and analyses by our experts, the latest case studies from our clients as well as guides, explainers and more to turn your supply chain risk management programme into a resounding success story.
