Emerging Threat
PaloAlto GlobalProtect: Emerging Threat published on Risk Ledger
According to IBM's 2024 Cost of a Data Breach Report, supply chain attacks now account for 37% of all data breaches, a significant increase from previous years, with organisations affected by third-party breaches facing average losses of $4.5 million per incident.
Even more alarming, Gartner reports that 60% of organisations now work with more than 1,000 third-party vendors, exponentially increasing their potential attack surface.
The surge in supply chain attacks reflects a strategic shift in cyber criminal tactics. Rather than directly targeting large organisations, attackers increasingly exploit vulnerabilities in smaller vendors to gain access to their larger clients' networks and data.
Vendor risk assessment thus becomes increasingly critical as organisations continue digitising and expanding their vendor networks. A single compromised vendor can expose your organisation to significant financial losses, regulatory penalties, and reputational damage.
This article examines the essential components for conducting vendor risk assessments, providing a structured approach to evaluating and managing third-party risks. By implementing thorough assessment practices, organisations can better protect their assets, maintain compliance, and build resilient vendor relationships in an increasingly complex threat landscape.
A vendor risk assessment constitutes a systematic evaluation of risks introduced by third-party business relationships. This process encompasses multiple risk domains and considers both direct and indirect impacts on business operations, data security, and regulatory compliance.
Vendor relationships expose organisations to multiple risk categories that demand comprehensive evaluation through standardised frameworks and controls. A thorough assessment must examine three core risk domains: security, environmental/social/governance (ESG), and financial risks.
Security risks form the foundation of vendor risk assessments, encompassing multiple critical domains. The controls in each domain require evaluation across corporate networks, cloud environments, and development practices, including verification of security certifications, policy frameworks, and data protection compliance.
ESG risks encompass organisational impact beyond traditional security concerns, focusing on sustainable and responsible business practices.
Financial risk assessment examines controls and procedures that protect against financial crimes and ensure vendor stability.
Timing is crucial in vendor risk management. While initial assessments establish baselines, ongoing monitoring and periodic reviews ensure you maintain visibility into evolving vendor risks throughout the contract lifecycle with any given vendor or partner.
Initial assessments establish baseline risk profiles and control requirements. This phase encompasses vendor capabilities, security posture, and compliance status. The process identifies critical risk indicators and establishes monitoring parameters for ongoing oversight.
Continuous monitoring captures changes in vendor risk profiles and control effectiveness. This includes automated security monitoring, compliance verification, and performance tracking. Risk indicators provide early warning of emerging threats and control degradation.
Periodic comprehensive reviews evaluate changes in vendor relationships, risk landscapes, and control environments. These assessments incorporate lessons learned, emerging threats, and evolving business requirements. The process validates long-term vendor viability and relationship value, and establishes that no important controls have changed since the last assessments, and no new potential vulnerabilities have been introduced.
Organisations rely on established frameworks to structure their vendor assessments. These frameworks provide standardised approaches to evaluate vendor security controls, compliance status, and overall risk posture. It’s very important to note, however, that frameworks vary in their effectiveness.
Industry-standard frameworks provide structured approaches to vendor assessments. These frameworks incorporate control objectives, assessment criteria, and evaluation methodologies. Framework selection depends on industry requirements, risk profiles, and assessment scope, but while often used, they are not appropriate for an effective third-party risk management and vendor assessments as they are currently utilised.
International standards establish baseline security requirements and control objectives. These frameworks provide comprehensive coverage of security domains and control categories. The international standards are often used as a basic template by many organisations, which then try and tailor them to their specific assessment requirements.
Organisation-specific frameworks address unique risk profiles and business requirements. These frameworks incorporate industry standards, regulatory requirements, and organisational risk appetite. Framework customisation enables targeted assessment of critical risk areas.
The execution of vendor risk assessments requires examining policies, controls, data handling, and incident response capabilities of your vendors and other critical third-parties.
This phase of a vendor risk assessment verifies that vendors' stated security measures align with their actual practices and meet your organisation's requirements.
Security policy review encompasses governance structures, control frameworks, and implementation methodologies. Critical areas include information classification, access control, change management, and incident response. Policy evaluation considers completeness, effectiveness, and practical implementation.
Technical control assessment covers protection mechanisms, detection capabilities, and response procedures. Control evaluation encompasses architecture design, implementation effectiveness, and operational maintenance. Security control assessment includes both preventive and detective measures.
Data protection assessment addresses collection, processing, storage, and disposal practices. Critical considerations include data classification, encryption requirements, and privacy controls. Assessment scope covers both structured and unstructured data across all processing environments.
Response capability assessment evaluates detection, containment, and recovery procedures. Business continuity assessment addresses operational resilience and recovery capabilities. Critical elements include communication protocols, escalation procedures, and recovery time objectives.
Risk analysis transforms assessment findings into actionable intelligence.
This phase involves categorising threats, evaluating their likelihood and impact, and determining which risks require immediate attention based on your organisation's risk tolerance.
Risk categorisation considers impact areas, control domains, and organisational context. Categorisation frameworks incorporate both qualitative and quantitative factors. Risk classification enables structured analysis and response planning.
Risk analysis incorporates threat intelligence, vulnerability assessment, and impact evaluation. Likelihood assessment considers historical data, current threats, and control effectiveness. Impact analysis addresses direct effects, indirect consequences, and long-term implications.
Risk prioritisation considers organisational risk appetite, resource constraints, and remediation feasibility. Prioritisation frameworks incorporate multiple risk factors and business contexts. Response planning addresses both immediate risks and long-term risk reduction.
Effective vendor assessment programmes integrate compliance requirements, external monitoring, security team engagement, and comprehensive risk evaluation. These practices ensure your programme adapts to emerging threats while supporting business objectives.
Compliance requirements span multiple regulatory frameworks and industry standards. Integration approaches address overlapping requirements and control objectives. Assessment methodologies incorporate compliance verification and evidence collection.
External monitoring encompasses security ratings, threat intelligence, control verification. The monitoring scope could include technical indicators and business factors. Data collection addresses point-in-time assessment and trending analysis.
Security coordination requires clear communication channels and response procedures. Engagement models address both routine assessment and incident response, and collaboration frameworks incorporate multiple stakeholder perspectives.
Holistic risk assessment incorporates multiple risk domains and interdependencies. The scope includes direct relationships and the extended supply chain. Risk evaluation considers cumulative effects and systemic impacts.
Technology platforms have become essential for managing the complexity of modern vendor relationships. These solutions streamline the assessment process, provide real-time risk visibility, and ensure consistent evaluation across vendor portfolios.
Leading vendor risk management platforms like Risk Ledger offer a comprehensive assessment framework that maps to major standards including ISO27002, NIST, and NCSC CAF. Core capabilities encompass assessment automation, standardised data collection, and sophisticated analysis and reporting functions. The most effective solutions provide seamless integration capabilities, robust workflow management, and detailed reporting functionality.
Modern assessment platforms deliver significant operational benefits. Automation reduces manual effort while improving assessment consistency. Real-time dashboards provide continuous visibility into vendor risk profiles, while analytics capabilities reveal risk trends across the vendor ecosystem. Through standardised, control-based questions, organisations can efficiently evaluate vendors across security, ESG, and financial risk domains.
Risk Ledger's approach exemplifies the evolution of vendor risk assessment tools. The platform enables instant connection to supplier security profiles, eliminating repetitive questionnaires and assessment fatigue for suppliers and offers clients seeking to conduct assessments against their suppliers with access to already over 8000 active suppliers that have already completed security assessments and been vetted by their clients. Organisations joining Risk Ledger find that between 50-60% of all their suppliers are already using Risk Ledger, cutting down the need for initial assessments from scratch for these organisations. Suppliers benefit by maintaining a single, comprehensive profile that serves multiple clients, while organisations gain continuous visibility into their supplier risks through regular profile updates and Risk Ledger-managed biannual reassessments of vendors.
The escalating frequency and sophistication of supply chain attacks makes comprehensive vendor risk assessment essential for business survival. Organisations must implement structured assessment programmes that combine initial evaluations with continuous monitoring to maintain visibility into their evolving vendor risk landscape.
Risk Ledger offers a sophisticated solution to this complex challenge. Our framework maps comprehensively against leading international standards including NIST, ISO27001, UK CAF, and Cyber Essentials Plus, ensuring your vendor assessments meet global compliance requirements. We maintain and update this framework continuously, adapting to new regulations and emerging best practices so you can focus on your core business operations.
With over 8,000 suppliers already using our platform, Risk Ledger is establishing itself as the international standard for third-party risk assessments. Our standardised approach delivers immediate practical benefits—organisations typically find that 40-60% of their suppliers already maintain Risk Ledger profiles, enabling instant access to peer-reviewed assessments. Connecting with vendors becomes as simple as connecting on a professional network, providing immediate access to detailed security profiles.
Through bi-annual automated reassessments of all suppliers, Risk Ledger eliminates the traditional burden of vendor chase-ups and questionnaire management. This systematic approach ensures you maintain continuous visibility into your vendor risks while reducing the operational overhead traditionally associated with vendor risk management.
The choice is clear: Organisations can either struggle with fragmented, resource-intensive vendor assessments or adopt a streamlined, standardised approach that ensures comprehensive risk visibility while reducing operational burden. Risk Ledger provides the latter.
Book a demonstration now, and start protecting your organisation.
Sign up to our monthly newsletter to receive exclusive research and analyses by our experts, the latest case studies from our clients as well as guides, explainers and more to turn your supply chain risk management programme into a resounding success story.
