White Paper
Defend-as-One: The Case for Collaboration in Defending Against Cyber Attacks
A Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) framework is a structured approach that integrates key elements of corporate governance, enterprise risk management, and regulatory compliance into business processes. It provides a unified system to ensure that an organisation’s operations align with its strategic objectives, regulatory obligations, and risk appetite.
A well-implemented GRC framework enables stronger decision-making, reduces exposure to operational, legal, and reputational risks, supports compliance with evolving regulations, and creates transparency for stakeholders.
Without a GRC framework, organisations risk missing regulatory updates, failing audits, or struggling to coordinate responsibilities across teams. These failures lead to significant financial penalties, reputational damage, and even operational disruptions. In today's environment of rising regulatory scrutiny and increasing third-party risk, the absence of a clear GRC strategy is a critical vulnerability.
To fully understand GRC and how to implement it in your organisation, we must consider its components.
Governance refers to the structures and policies that define leadership, accountability, and oversight within an organisation. It ensures that roles and responsibilities are clearly defined, decisions are made transparently, and actions align with business values.
Key governance elements include leadership accountability, board oversight, committee structures, and documented policies that guide ethical conduct, escalation procedures, and strategic alignment.
Risk management focuses on monitoring and managing risks across the organisation. In contrast, an organisation’s "risk appetite" refers to the level of risk it is willing to accept, and its "tolerance level" is the maximum risk it can tolerate.
Knowing these levels are essential, as effective risk management frameworks depend on structured processes for risk analysis (identifying and assessing risks), risk treatment plans (actions to mitigate or manage risks), residual risk evaluation (reviewing risks that remain after treatment), and continuous monitoring, with defined thresholds (limits that signal concern) and triggers (events that prompt action).
Compliance involves adhering to relevant laws, regulations, standards, and internal policies. In the UK and the EU, this often includes frameworks such as GDPR, ISO 27001, and the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) for the financial services industry.
Organisations must document obligations, controls, and regulatory changes, and conduct regular audits to demonstrate compliance, including supply chain partners that introduce additional exposure.
A mature GRC programme includes internal controls (measures to ensure procedures are followed), key performance indicators (KPIs, metrics that show performance), and key risk indicators (KRIs, metrics that signal potential risks) to assess effectiveness. Monitoring systems track whether controls are being followed and flag deviations for further investigation.
The need for a GRC framework is driven by regulatory pressure and business necessity. In regulated sectors like financial services, failure to comply with GDPR, DORA, or the FCA’s Operational Resilience regime can result in fines, operational sanctions, or licence loss.
From a business standpoint, GRC frameworks build stakeholder trust. Customers and partners increasingly demand transparency, especially when handling sensitive data or engaging in cross-border operations. A documented GRC framework supports audit readiness and streamlines vendor onboarding processes.
These steps outline how to implement a GRC framework in your organisation successfully.
Define GRC objectives, align with business goals, prioritise key areas, secure executive sponsorship, allocate resources, and set baseline metrics and KPIs.
Review current policies, procedures, and compliance protocols. Map tools, responsibilities, and processes to regulatory needs. Identify redundancies, gaps, and inconsistencies.
Assign GRC responsibilities. These are primarily executive sponsors, the risk committee, the compliance officer, and internal audit. Define decision rights, escalation paths, and coordination protocols. Document and communicate structures.
Draft or refine policies that govern behaviour, risk response, and regulatory adherence. This includes procedural controls (e.g. approval processes), technical controls (e.g. access management), and organisational controls (e.g. segregation of duties). Standardise processes for incident response, compliance reviews, and risk assessments.
Select a GRC platform that aligns with your regulatory obligations and workflow needs. Key capabilities include automated risk assessments (systematic risk evaluations), evidence tracking, visual dashboards (data summaries), and audit trails (records of changes). Look for integration with existing systems, such as HR (Human Resources), finance, and IT (Information Technology). In the UK/EU context, ensure the tool supports GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation), DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act), and other relevant frameworks.
Embed GRC in culture. Deliver role-based training using scenarios. Communicate policies and expectations clearly. Reinforce shared accountability.
Establish review cycles, track KPIs and KRIs, conduct audits, and gather post-event feedback. Use findings to improve policies and adapt GRC as needed.
Organisations often struggle with silos, fragmented tools, and a lack of leadership buy-in. Change management can stall progress if employees view GRC as bureaucratic or burdensome. Data quality issues may affect risk reporting or compliance accuracy.
To overcome these barriers:
A modern GRC stack typically includes:
In a UK/EU context, platforms must support evidence collection, regulation-specific modules (e.g. GDPR, DORA), secure data handling, and exportable audit reports. Integration with third-party data feeds, supplier platforms, and internal tools is essential to streamline governance and reduce manual work.
Measuring success is key to sustaining investment. Useful GRC metrics include:
Set escalation thresholds for high-impact issues and regularly benchmark performance against industry standards or regulatory expectations.
Risk Ledger supports GRC implementation across the key area of supply chain due diligence:
Risk management is one component of a GRC framework. GRC combines governance, risk, and compliance into a unified strategy for oversight, accountability, and control.
Implementation timelines vary, but most organisations can begin rollout within 3 to 6 months. Full maturity may take a year or more, depending on scope and resourcing.
Any organisation with regulatory exposure, complex supply chains, or multiple departments can benefit. Size matters less than complexity and risk profile.
You can start manually, but spreadsheets quickly become unmanageable. A dedicated GRC platform reduces error, improves oversight, and scales with your needs.
Review at least annually or when there are significant regulatory changes, internal incidents, or shifts in business strategy.
A GRC framework provides a strong foundation for resilience, trust, and strategic execution within a modern organisation.
It aligns leadership, embeds risk management into daily operations, and strengthens compliance across all levels of the organisation. With a clear structure in place, teams can act decisively, demonstrate accountability, and build lasting confidence with stakeholders, regulators, and partners.
Contact Risk Ledger today to see how our platform can streamline your GRC implementation with shared assessments, continuous monitoring, and real-time visibility across your third-party ecosystem.
Monthly research, case studies and practical guides you won't find anywhere else.
Join thousands of security managers turning their TPRM programmes into success stories.
