UK energy security hinges on robust Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM). Discover how Ofgem's Adapted CAF Profile enforces new, prescriptive standards for supply chain cyber security, demanding continuous assurance and zero-trust principles for critical vendors.
The UK energy sector, the lifeblood of the nation's critical infrastructure and economy, faces a complex and escalating array of cyber threats. For senior TPRM and cyber security leaders, securing this ecosystem has become a question of national resilience. The growing dependency on multi-tiered and increasingly complex supply chains introduces inherent vulnerabilities that malicious actors, ranging from sophisticated criminal groups to state-sponsored entities, actively seek to exploit.
In this context, the sector regulator, Ofgem, has significantly sharpened its focus. By adapting the UK government’s standard Cyber Assessment Framework (CAF), Ofgem has introduced a sector-specific profile that sets a demanding, new standard for supply chain cyber security and Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) in the sector.
The UK energy sector—spanning electricity generation, transmission, distribution, and gas supply—is designated as Critical National Infrastructure (CNI). Its continuous, secure operation is paramount to national security, public health, and economic stability.
The inherent risks within its supply chain are profound:
The challenge is compounded by increasingly interconnected IT and OT systems and a complex, often opaque, multi-tiered supplier ecosystem. Recognising this systemic risk, regulators like Ofgem have prioritised the formalisation and enforcement of rigorous supply chain security and TPRM standards across the sector.
Ofgem acts as the Competent Authority under the Network and Information Systems (NIS) Regulations 2018 for the downstream gas and electricity sectors. This legislation grants Ofgem the mandate to ensure that Operators of Essential Services (OES) take the necessary and proportionate measures to protect the security of their network and information systems.
Its role is not merely supervisory; it is a critical enforcer of enhanced cyber regulation aimed at maintaining the security and resilience of essential energy services. To execute this mandate, Ofgem leverages the National Cyber Security Centre’s (NCSC) CAF, a core component of the UK's cyber resilience strategy. However, the standard CAF requires refinement to adequately address the energy sector’s unique threat landscape and operational realities.
The Cyber Assessment Framework (CAF) is the NCSC’s overarching mechanism for assessing the cyber resilience of CNI. It is an outcomes-based framework consisting of 14 high-level security principles designed to cover four main objectives: managing security risks, protecting against cyber attack, detecting security events, and minimising the impact of security incidents.
Ofgem’s Adapted CAF Profile differs by introducing an Enhanced Profile tailored specifically for the UK energy sector. Key distinctions and enhancements include:
This Enhanced Profile represents the authoritative baseline for security and resilience expectations against which OES compliance is assessed.
Supply chain cyber security and TPRM are not peripheral concerns; they are integral to protecting the UK energy sector. The complexity of managing multi-tiered supplier ecosystems—including IT service providers, operational technology vendors, software developers, and cloud service platforms—means the attack surface is vast. Risk is continuous and evolving fast, necessitating ongoing vigilance that extends far beyond a one-off initial vetting of new suppliers during onboarding.
The adapted profile translates the high-level CAF principles into concrete, enforceable requirements for TPRM:
Supplier Inventory and Access Control
Operators must maintain an up-to-date inventory of all suppliers with access to systems supporting essential functions. This involves granular mapping of supplier access, privileges, and connections to both OT and IT environments.
Security Controls for Third Parties
Critical suppliers must adhere to equivalent cyber security controls as internal staff. This includes mandatory identity verification, multifactor authentication (MFA), corporate device management, and securely managed remote access practices.
Contractual Cyber Security Obligations
Supplier contracts must embed clear cyber security requirements, including explicit rights for the Operator to conduct continuous assurance activities (e.g., audits, penetration tests). Contracts must also enforce obligations for timely incident reporting and transparency.
Continuous Risk Assessment and Monitoring
One-off assessments are insufficient. There must be an ongoing, cyclical evaluation of supplier cyber posture, vulnerabilities, and incident response readiness, with results informing dynamic risk registers and mitigation plans.
Incident Reporting and Transparency
Operators must establish efficient communication channels with key suppliers to rapidly report and respond to third-party cyber incidents, minimising potential cascading impacts on energy supply.
The framework mandated by Ofgem requires OES to:
Operators must demonstrate compliance through Red-Amber-Green (RAG) assessments against contributing outcomes related to supply chain and TPRM. This evidence must be robust: documented controls, audit results, risk assessments, and corrective action plans must be available for regulatory scrutiny. The framework does allow for planned deviations, but only with documented, risk-based justification and clear mitigation strategies.
To achieve the required level of assurance, energy operators must strategically adopt:
Ofgem’s compliance mechanism utilises RAG attainment levels—a more definitive scoring system than the broader CAF’s outcomes-based approach—to provide a clear measure of security postures. Green signifies full compliance, Amber indicates areas requiring action, and Red signifies serious deficiencies.
Evidence expectations are high, requiring proof of not only policies but also their effective implementation and operational longevity. Crucially, the framework allows for flexibility: if an Operator can credibly justify a deviation from a control using a risk-based assessment supported by expert judgment and documented mitigations, this can be deemed compliant. The comprehensive reporting and inspection frameworks support this assurance model, ensuring that the regulator has a clear view of an OES's true risk exposure.
Under the NIS Regulations, Ofgem possesses substantial powers for inspection, demand for evidence, constructive engagement, and, ultimately, enforcement. Failure to meet the security requirements can lead to significant financial penalties, compelling executive-level attention to cyber resilience.
Looking ahead, the evolving regulatory landscape, potentially shaped by the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill, is anticipated to further increase the regulatory burden and maturity expectations. Operators should prepare for continuous escalation in the stringency of controls and assurance requirements by the 2027 timeframe.
To strategically align with Ofgem’s Adapted CAF Profile and ensure national energy resilience, senior TPRM and cyber security leaders must take decisive action:
The link between supply chain cyber security, regulatory requirements, and national energy resilience is absolute. Ofgem’s Adapted CAF Profile is not simply another compliance document; it is a cornerstone for driving mature, sector-wide improvements in managing systemic risk.
Energy operators are called upon to move beyond minimum compliance and proactively embrace comprehensive supply chain risk management within this stringent new regulatory framework. The security of the UK's energy supply hinges on it.
Monthly research, case studies and practical guides you won't find anywhere else.
Join thousands of risk managers turning their TPRM programmes into success stories.
